President Trump and his predecessor Joe Biden agree largely on a major question with the ability to reshape the technology world: Google must be dismantled.
But there is an important difference that appeared in the file of last Friday: the Trump Ministry of Justice wants to allow Google (Google, Googl) to invest in artificial intelligence. Miscellaneously has a share in Openaii Anthropor Competition worth billions of billions.
Mark Mcreen, Professor of Business Law at the Kelog College of Administration at North Westman University, said that the retreat of the Biden administration’s request to force Google to sell Amnesty International’s stakes “important” and “very justified”.
“This may be an indication that the government is concerned about deterring artificial intelligence in the global race with China,” added David Olson, a assistant law professor at the Law College at Boston College.
The parents, the alphabet, fell more than 4 % on Monday, as other technology shares were also sold to macroeconomic fears.
Nasdaqgs – quited quote•US dollar
Near: March 10 at 4:00:01 pm EST
The final decision on what is happening will be for the $ 2 trillion -dollar Google Empire in court in the hands of Federal Judge Amit Mihita, who died last August that Google illegally monopolizes the online markets for “general research” and “general research text”.
Regardless of what Mihata decides, Google is expected to resume, and the Ministry of Justice can also. Listening sessions to decide on treatments in this case are scheduled for April and May.
The final treatment recommendations were from the government and Google because of the judge on Friday, as it was given another opportunity led by Trump to change the previous Biden era’s proposal to the judge that Google is dismantled with the forced sales of the Google Chrome browser or selling it in the Android operating system.
He did not, despite the pressure by the company to reconsider the Chrome’s proposal on national security concerns.
“Google must strip the Chrome browser – an important arrival point for research,” the Ministry of Justice said in its final proposal on Friday.
He argued that with a different owner, a new competitor will have “an opportunity to run an important gateway to search the Internet, free from controlling Google’s monopoly.”
They also kept a portion of the request to leave the door open to a possible abstraction of the Google Android operating system.
But the prosecutors have dropped the Biden Doj batch for Google to sell AI’s bets, instead, indicating a preparation where federal authorities can maintain the tabs on the proposed Amnesty International’s investments that may threaten the research competition.
Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Permon Compane Alphabet, in 2024. Reuters/Gonzalo Funets ·Reuters / Reuters
Antarubor argued to the judge by forcing Google to abandon its share would tend to the field of artificial intelligence in favor of Openai and Backer, Microsoft (MSFT).
On Friday, the Ministry of Justice said in its revised proposal: “Prosecutors are no longer searching for mandatory investments of Amnesty International’s investments from Google,” said the Ministry of Justice on Friday in its revised proposal.
Derek Montford, one of the shareholders of the Gunster commercial vowing group, who specializes in litigation in the fight against monopoly, said while the response from the Trump administration is a privilege, it comes with a hook.
“They are asking to attach some requirements to report it,” he said.
“I think someone [antitrust] Topics that you may see in the second Trump administration are even if they are heading to some proposed penalties, there is still an element, monitoring and enforcement that occur in the background. “
“He is participating in an existential battle with China for the future of artificial intelligence, and Google still can be an important weapon for the United States.
“What will we do, and one of the main contestants in the United States gave in this race by dismantling that company?” Kovasfic, who previously led the American Google Policy and Foreign Affairs strategy.
“It seems unwanted to do so.”
The Ministry of Justice did not adhere to the proposal of another expected treatment that strikes great competition in the case.
I asked the judge to ban Google from the contracts that secure its search engine as a virtual driver across dozens of Internet -connected devices, such as mobile phones made by Apple (AAPL), Samsung and others, browsers, including Safari’s Safari and Mozilla’s Firefox.
This is not a good news for Apple, as a large revenue flow endangers. In 2021, Google paid $ 26 billion for virtual search, and Assad’s share of that went to Apple.
Bernstein’s Apple Decoration of Google Search Defults estimated between $ 18 billion and $ 20 billion annually.
The Google logo is displayed in front of the company’s headquarters at Mountain View, California. ·Justin Sullivan via Getty Images
Google faced the request of the Ministry of Justice on Friday by requesting that it is still free to conclude contracts to make Google Search virtual – as long as it does not explain the search license based on the approval of the devices manufacturers also to distribute, put, place, use, or license.
Makars, a law professor at North Westren, said that the Ministry of Justice has a little that it loses at this stage by adhering to chrome on the chip of negotiations, given that both the basic case and the judge’s decision regarding treatments are subject to appeal.
Makari said: “From the negotiating negotiation site for bargaining, at this stage of measures, I did not feel shocked or surprised that the new police mayor in the city continued to argue with the abstraction of vineyards.”
Alexis Kennan is a legal correspondent for the financing of Yahoo. Follow Alexis on x Alexisweed.
Click here to get the latest technology news that will affect the stock market
Read the latest financial and commercial news from Yahoo Financing
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user\'s experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
