The Oregon Appeals Court says that the law of the weapons approved by voters is constitutional, which reflects the judgment of the lower court

Salem, Oregon (AFP) – The Oregon Appeals Court found on Wednesday that the arms control law that voters had approved more than two years ago is a constitutional, reflecting the judgment of the minimum judge of the state judge who kept it.

The law, one of the most difficult in the country, requires people to undergo a criminal background and complete a training course for arms safety in order to obtain a permit to buy a firearm. It also prohibits high -capacity magazines with more than 10 rounds.

The 114 scale was linked to the State Court and the Federal Court since it was tightly approved by voters in November 2022. It was among the first weapons restrictions to be approved after the Supreme Court in the United States was changed in 2022, and it is expected that the guidance judges will follow when considering cases of the second amendment.

The state judge in rural areas in southeast of Oregon prohibited the law temporarily from the law after weapons filed a lawsuit claiming to have violated the right to carry weapons under the Origon State Constitution. Then he presided over the judge of the District Court, Robert S. Rasho is a trial in 2023 in Harney County and decided that the law violates the state constitution. The Office of the Public Prosecutor in Oregon appealed the ruling.

In their opinion on Wednesday, a committee of three judges from the Appeal Court in Oregon found that the law of law to purchase in law and prohibiting the magazine is highly capable of “do not frustrate” the right to defend armed self -self -self -defense under the state constitution.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office said that the law will not come into effect immediately, as those who challenge the law before the law are 35 days to search for further review of the appeal.

The Oregon Prosecutor Dan Rivild welcomed the ruling. “The Origonone voted in favor of this, and it is time to move forward in proper safety measures,” he said in a statement.

Tony Ayilo Junior, the main lawyer who represents weapons in the case, said he intends to appeal the ruling before the Supreme Court of Oregon. In a statement on Wednesday, he said that the procedure is 114 “transformed millions of Oregon into criminals because their right to carry weapons was erased by the judiciary in the state of Oregon.”

In a separate federal case due to this measure, a judge stated that he was legal under the second amendment to the American constitution. Prosecutors in this federal case, which includes the Oregon Firearium, has resumed the judgment of the Appeals Court in the ninth American district.