The passenger, who refused to give the corridor seat to the traveler “overweight” on the trip is to guess its second decision

Aircraft passenger in the air about her decision not to abandon the corridor seat she bought to another traveler on her flight.

The woman recalled the story of her travel at the Parents and Motherhood Forum on February 22, and then asked the forum if she was unreasonable.

“I booked (and paid for it) the corridor seat and a medium seat,” she started her position. “The journey was full, so we knew that someone would sit on the window seat. The man arrived after us and it was very clear that he would really fight to pressure two seats and in his seat. He was very overweight (there is no judgment, just mentioning the facts).”

Related: He wanted a victim of the capital’s crash to repair his old car for his son. His nephew will finish “preserving his legacy alive” (exclusive)

Then, the man asked them if he could get the corridor seat.

“It was a 4.5 -hour trip and I chose the corridor seat so that I could reach [toilet] It is easy – the weak bladder, “I wrote.” The hostess was involved and also asked whether we could “move”. It was really embarrassing to all concerned, but I stood on my ground and politely refused. “

“The man took the window seat as due, but it took him some time to mix,” and she continued, adding that, unlike it, he did not pay for a seat in advance, which means that he was chosen for him based on the remaining seats that were not purchased on their journey.

Related: My mother asks his colleagues from the passenger to move from the economy in addition to the coach so that she can sit with her son, then cry when she told no

She noted that she had no sick intentions and that he was “a nice man.” She preferred the corridor seat because she often used the toilet, and whenever a man needs to go to the bathroom, they “allow him to be happy.”

“I don’t think I was unreasonable because I paid the price of the seats, but I left me a little bad for him,” I admitted, before I asked the Mumsnet Forum about their opinions. “There is not a lot of benefit to pay for the seats if you could not sit on it already. Were you unreasonable?”

Never miss a story-subscribe to the free daily newsletter for people to stay aware of the best of people, from celebrities news to the convincing human interest stories.

The response was mixed with women’s inquiries in the comments section.

“It was clear that it was wrong,” one person answered. “It must have been previously booked if it has special requirements. If it is an emergency trip at the last minute, it should be offered at least the payment of the cost of your seats if they are not provided and buy a drink or something from this as well.”

Meanwhile, another Momsinite user said that the man was “not wrong.”

“Asking a question, which would make something easier for himself, [you] This reader said: “It does not seem to rise to a big drama where someone is right and the other is a mistake.”

A third reader replied, “Do not feel bad about it, you also have a real reason for the desire for the corridor seat. You feel proud of yourself.”

Read the original article on people